Posted in Uncategorized on 03/08/2011 09:03 pm by admin
Why the Dalai Lama in the news a lot lately?
I've seen on the news a lot in the last month or two, but it is very difficult to get up with the story now that here. What's happening with him in the news?
It has tons of media influence-courtesy Western governments.
Posted in Uncategorized on 02/25/2011 02:39 am by admin
China Between a rock and a hard place as Tibet refuses to disappear
With the Dalai Lama visit of President Barack Obama this afternoon, China is finding it increasingly caught between a rock and a hard place because the situation of dealing with the issue of Tibet continues to play out in a manner unfavorable to the wishes Beijing. The questions now we have asked, not only outside but inside China and on the sustainability of current government policy in Tibet is implemented. One thing seems clear, despite the new wealth of China, WTO Members and the host of the Olympics, the Tibet issue will not go away.
China's wealth in Asia has led at times to use this as a diplomatic tool to achieve its political path. He has also used the power of veto which is within several organizations – such as the Asian Development Bank – to block funding does not approve of. His constant blocking of the ADB to finance India for the development of Arunachal Pradesh, for example, a state in northern India that borders Tibet, inhibits the growth of Asia's poorest areas. All members of the Asian Development Bank approved the loan. China, with veto power, no, insisting it is a disputed territory, part of Tibet and does not fall under the jurisdiction of the government of India to administer. Historically, however, the region has never been under Chinese control. Such acts make China a few friends regional, and that angers India, the most powerful neighbor China.
China has also been courting the smaller countries of the Himalayas near Tibet. Nepal, for example, that the Maoist insurgents are politically closer to China, for the first time in centuries has positioned the first ministerial visit to Beijing over visits to New Delhi in importance. Nepal is closer to China than to India, who is more historical, cultural and ethnically related. Politics, trade and the money offered. The purchase of China's diplomacy is somehow going to help with the acceptance of China's policy on the issue of Tibet on the border with Nepal. However, beyond countries like these, the policy seems to be making much progress. The Chinese leadership must have thought it would be so different. But financial power does not necessarily translate into the desired results, and may be counterproductive.
With WTO accession, a goal long sought after final outcome, the accumulation of huge foreign exchange reserves giving financial power and global prestige of holding the Olympics, the last times have appeared to Chinese leaders as if everything goes well with the national image and credibility in foreign policy. Learning is, however, that the money and trade alone can not buy the political. Here, China must have a serious rethink.
As the Dalai Lama meets with President Obama today, Chinese boil. Regarded as a "separatist", which remains an anathema to China. However, in Tibet, even today, is still regarded as the true leader of the region, the indigenous population. People regardless of what the Chinese might suggest, remain faithful to their culture and, consequently, the Dalai Lama as spiritual leader.
When China stopped buying Tibetan emperors to legitimate their blessings – for your convenience historic first transmitted by Dalai Lama to help legitimize the state after the ruling Mongols and later moved to China as the regional balance of power changed – with the infamous Mao's "Religion is poison" statement to the young Dalai Lama, sealed the fate of Tibet. China without obtaining the legitimacy of the Dalai Lama, Tibet found himself not from a political, religious and military to maintain their independence. With the Dalai Lama Located next to the Tibetan government in exile in Dharamsala, China now instead view the Dalai Lama as a seditious and subversive, which act against the interests of the Chinese state while being based in India.
However, as their subversion is explained by his previous role as a leader elected by the well-known historical processes, without opposition from China at the time his coronation, not added. However, today's China believes that the continued hosting of the Dalai Lama in India as a hostile act, a situation that has led recently continuous border incursions by China to India in a show of constant harassment on the organization of a subversive scheme. The status quo in terms such, it has remained that way since 1959 with the arrival of the Dalai Lama in India. It also should be noted, sparked regional conflicts and border wars between China and India in the past, most recently in 1962. The tensions and mistrust between the two parties to continue as India was found, after the annexation of Tibet of China with a completely new government to discuss territorial issues that had been negotiated over Lhasa and the Dalai Lama directly. He has often demonstrated a ride bumpy for India to deal with Communist ideology in its borders from the earlier Buddhist.
However, despite the contentious history, times have passed. China has invested large sums of money in Tibet, including the creation of the service the world's highest railway, linking the region directly with the system China's national railway. Now the Tibetans can easily trade with the rest of China, and vice versa. Airports and hotels have been developed, and the influx of Chinese tourists regularly make the trip overseas. By contrast, Tibet in many ways is more open now than ever. It is easier to reach, safer, more secure. No However, Tibetans usually not considered as Chinese, and not regard them as legitimate custodians of Tibetan culture. It remains difficult for the Communist Party justified as guardians of Tibetan culture, which in turn is very religious, while at the same time, maintaining an official policy of atheism.
The implications of this are to appear shortly. The Dalai Lama is 75 years, and inevitably will happen in the coming years. When that happens, China will face a problem mass in the appointment of his successor. It is likely that the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan government in exile is a successor who reside outside of China. Priority exists. The fourth Dalai Lama was declared in Tibet, but in Mongolia. China, meanwhile is expected to resist the discovery of a Dalai Lama appointed by the Tibetan government in exile and declare it has been found an alternative. There is no precedent for this too. The Panchen Lama, Tibet's second highest religious figure, has been found in such circumstances, with both parties which states have identified their reincarnation.
The impact on Tibet in the intellectual struggle for control of legitimate moral and religious life of Tibetan culture and also in the entire Himalayan region is intended to be disturbing. China has already demonstrated the ability to send troops to Tibet in mass, effectively sealing its borders and prevent the international coverage of what is happening in the region. However, to do so could give rise to claims of genocide or ethnic cleansing if the situation deteriorates, he becomes violent and troops begin to open fire. That would be almost intolerable for China to strive for acceptance and recognition. Condemnation International would be swift, and the cumulative pressures of foreign investors to abandon or reduce investment in China would be immense. Not a priority for this too too. The Holiday Inn, foreigners only brand of Tibet, Lhasa withdrew several years due to pressure from shareholders on China policy in Tibet. No foreign hotel chain has entered the Tibetan market since then.
Dalai Lama meeting with President Obama is an indication that despite the China's rise to world fame, has not yet succeeded in finding a solution to the problem of Tibet. In fact, the current social situation in China has deteriorated since Olympic Games instead of better as was the stated objective. With Facebook and other social media sites blocked, inaccessible, YouTube, Wikipedia and increasingly censored news filtered through the state approval process, China is experiencing a dangerous journey to self-isolation, the stunting of their intelligence Nationally, the withdrawal of world relations, and little by little more paranoia. It need not be. China needs to find a morally and religiously acceptable change policy towards Tibet and the Dalai Lama very soon if nothing is leading a path that ultimately lead to much larger problems and pressures of a meeting of elderly Buddhist monk of 75 years of age, with the president of the United States.
About the Author
Chris Devonshire-Ellis is the publisher of 2point6billion.com and the founding partner of Dezan Shira & Associates, who have been doing business in China for over 20 years and maintain business advisors and accountants in Guangzhou, Beijing and other cities around China. Chris also writes for the China business news website, China-Briefing.
Posted in Uncategorized on 02/24/2011 10:16 pm by admin
ASIA LEADER deserves d labels' GREATEST STORY?
Asia has d most populous continent in the world of d & its fair to say that most of the 'big' the world's leaders come from continet d. Who u think was / is d best of all? Benazir Bhutto NOMINATIONS (Pakistan) to Chiang Kai-Sek (TAIWAN) Dalai Lama (?) Ferdinand Marcos (Philippines), Junichiro Koizumi (Japan), Kim Dae-Jung (KOREA S) Kim Il-Sung (Korea N) Lee Kuan Yew (S'pore) Dr Mahathir Mohamad (MALAYSIA) Mahatma Gandhi (India) Mao Tse-Tung (China) Reza Pahlavi (Iran), Sukarno (Indonesia) Xanana Gusmao (Timor-Leste) Yasser Arafat (Palestine), Yitzhak Rabin (Israel) [Other candidates are welcome THANKS] FOR ALL THAT D! Please give reasons for responding to year …
Mahatma Gandhi (India) because it was peaceful and gained its objective independence of India to obtain through peaceful means through negoitation
CCTV-9 Documentary on the Dalai Lama (Part 1 of 7)